Myself and my friend Adam have decided to play another ACW campaign. We already played a campaign with the Longstreet ruleset some years ago. Our ACW figures have been languishing in boxes and it was time they saw the table again.
I have really enjoyed playing the two rulesets put out by David Brown in the last couple of years as published by TFL under the Reisswitz Press banner. I have played quite a bit of Général d'Armée with my friend Iannick in Montreal and have become quite comfortable with the ruleset. Pickett's Charge has similar mechanisms but the overall game is a little simpler. I liked playing Longstreet but I find that Sam Mustafa's rules, although superbly written in a very clear fashion, are pared down a little too much for my taste. I really enjoy the complexity of decision making that is the main characteristic of TFL rules in general. Yes, they are a little less clearly written (both Rich Clarke and Dave Brown use a much more conversational style of writing than Sam Mustafa) but if you do not overthink what is written, I actually find them quite intelligible. They are my first choice for Napoleonics and ACW.
I initially planned writing a historical campaign and I still do but Adam recommended that we use the campaign system in Longstreet. George A. had given me an excellent pamphlet he had written surrounding the Pea Ridge campaign which I plan to work on. But impatience and finding time has lead me to agree with Adam, especially after I saw the preliminary work he had done on translating the Longstreet campaign system in such a way that it can be used with the Pickett's Charge ruleset. I generally do not like playing a-historic or points based games but I think this is going to be OK.
The first step in making the Longstreet (LS) campaign work using the Pickett's Charge (PC) ruleset was dealing with the fact that LS is at the brigade level while PC is at the divisional level. Also LS uses the number of bases in a force to make a lot of decisions in respect to victory points, attrition, and reinforcements. In respect to PC, the most important command decisions are made by the ADC function which does not exist in LS. LS also has a set of campaign cards which are fun to use which we wanted to keep for our campaign.
Below, I will go through the LS Campaign section as laid out in the rulebook with our modifications. I will keep this updated as we go through the process. I think if you are unfamiliar with LS some of the following maybe a little puzzling but of course if interested you can always buy the ruleset.
The campaign will be 9 turns and will cover 1861-1865 with a varying number of games per year. The 10 scenarios in the LS book will be randomly selected to play each turn. We are still deciding what will determine victory in each scenario and in the campaign.
PC is a multi-brigade game but we are going to start with a small force that will increase as each game is played. Each army will have 6 large green infantry units, 1 standard green cavalry unit (the USA may subsitute another infantry unit) and 1 three base mixed artillery battery. The player will arrange his army in 2 brigades with a composition of his choice.
In PC, each brigade gets an ADC as well as extras as determined by CiC. We have decided to double the brigade ADC complement for the first 2 years (3 turns) of the war. We will also add ADC's as follows:
- CSA 2 extra ADC's in 1861 (1 Battle)
- CSA 2 extra ADC's in 1862, USA 1 extra ADC (2 Battles)
- CSA/USA 2 extra ADC's in 1863 (3 Battles)
- CSA 1 extra ADC, USA 2 extra ADC's in 1864 (2 Battles)
- USA 2 extra ADC's in 1865 (1 Battle)
This is to reflect the changing fortunes of each side as the war progressed.
LS uses a system of Epic Points to accrue experience. A lot of it is based on the number of bases in combat etc. etc. I have to say that I always thought this was overly complex. This has been simplified as below.
- 2 points for each game played
- 1 point for a victory
- 1 point for each enemy dispersed unit as per PC
- 1 point for each scenario objective as per LS
We are planning to use this system as a tool to increase the size our forces. Still not 100% on how to do this but presently considering 1 extra standard sized regular or green infantry unit (experience as per year but probably regular graded units after 1862) for each half Epic Point rounded up.
Dealt with by the ADC system as above.
In PC, each unit acquires casualties points with a standard sized unit being dispersed after 12 casualties. If the unit is dispersed it is lost but at the end of each game the number of casualties in the non-dispersed units will be reduced by 2/3 rounded up for each unit.
Not in use.
At the end of a turn each player has a deck of campaign cards pertinent to the year and his army. Each player draws 4-6 cards depending on the year and can use them to improve or increase his army. We can not use all of them but can use most with some modification as below.
- New Artillery: as it written or add 1 standard unit of infantry
- Hail to the Chief : add 2 standard units of of regular infantry
- Sharpshooters: add 1 three base unit of regular skirmishers
- Transfer: add 1 standard unit of Veteran infantry
- CS Replacement: add 1 standard unit of Regular infantry
- Rebel Cavaliers: as written
- See the Elephant: Promote 1 unit from Green to Regular or Regular to Veteran and so on
- US Coloured Troops: add 1 large Green infantry unit
- Union Repeaters: +1CD to unit when firing
Artillery is limited to 4 batteries with a maximum of 6 guns (3 bases) but the CSA may only have one 3 base unit. One base artillery units are not allowed.
Maximum Army Size
LS lays out a maximum number of bases that each army may have, this was converted to units as below.
So that is where we are now, I suspect a few things have been missed and some changes will be made.